new standards with international standards

Recently, the frozen food brand-name enterprises missing, three full, Wan Chai Ferry Pier have been "the Peddler": sampling and Staphylococcus aureus in foods containing health hazard. Push the law enforcement responsibilities and related accountability in public questioning and enterprises in response to the game, to freeze the new national standard cause for concern. According to the new national standards, detection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria turned to quantitative and qualitative, in other words,That allows you to check out a small amount of Staphylococcus aureus in food, and the standards have been a number of companies quoted or even become a shield to prove qualified products. In the food security situation remains serious today, food safety standards are lower and lower? How to guarantee food safety? Interests of the consumers who will? Face the public on the new national standard "reverse" questions in the health sector tableAs shown in the new lower standards than the old standard of misreading, new standards with international standards, more in line with international food Microbe sampling requirements. Whether the standard scientific and reasonable, I believe that through rational serious discussions, there will be a final answer. However, whenever a food safety incident, the public tends to eyes focused on "food safety standard", it is food for thought: should have neutralConcept of safety standards, why has raised public criticism to question? ����If food safety standards have lost credibility, food safety and defense should from built up? Any standard, is a product of the times, should also keep pace with the, with the requirements of the times dovetails, and adapted to the development phase. However, one cannot avoid the fact is that behind the frequent incidents of food safety,Standard update lag food management in China, part of the standard long tread water, twenty or thirty years without change. ����In fact, many food safety incidents occurred in recent years, are relevant here. Of course, over the years, food safety standards are not fully "remain firm". Many standard argument back on amendments. However, the development of these new standards, often as a general qualityThe suspect. The reason is simple: as the standards development participants need considerable expertise, this restriction into the relevant departments and enterprises, experts of "shut the habit". ����Such standard-setting process, not only deprived the public of the right, the right to participate, also gave the public a "Maoni" conjecture of space. Over the years, whenever the public question the food safety standards are too low, the totalThere is a voice call standard pay attention to the conditions applied. This view is not wrong in a strict sense, but sometimes it seems irrelevant. In fact, no one knows a bite to eat in a fat man, will also respect the Chinese "developing" a reality. Is unacceptable to the public, from melamine incident to lean events swtor power leveling, many food safety standards already and "State" not relevant to the developmentChina should abandon these outdated food safety standards, but in reality these outdated standards did "peach still smiling spring breeze". Therefore, public concern about food safety, and revitalize the credibility of food safety standards, cannot just respond briefly to the departments concerned should also be thinking about development of food safety standards are already behind the times? Standard-setting made it publicOpen transparent? Whether the right to develop was "minorities", "a small number of enterprises" abduction? Only similar questions have been answered, and food safety standards don't become public anxiety, can also become a food safety firmly "firewall". Excerpts from November 25 to the people's daily the old republic power leveling, the Wen/Jiang �S ()