129762943202187500_104Gree electric appliances Dong Mingzhu: shelter allow electrical equipment store
Interview with Dong Mingzhu, President of gree electric appliances NetEase finance, March 14-day, Dong Mingzhu, President of gree electric appliances said in interview with NetEase finance, its main recommendations made two this year, is hoping to standard location for storage of electrical equipment of buildings, the second is the hope Enterprise independent innovation and intellectual property protection. Previously
diablo 3 gold, American electrical and gree electric patented technologyControversy has caused widespread concern in the community. Dong Mingzhu, which is one reason why its relevant recommendations. Dong Mingzhu suggested that enterprises at the time of invention, research related to environmental protection and energy saving technologies, often it's patents will not be able to get very good protection, between us and the United States, for example, our product patent is stolen by it, we lawyers case for three years before winning. SheThat, for lack of patent protection is detrimental to the independent innovation of enterprises, but also grow reluctant to innovative enterprises prefer to steal other people's ideas. In addition, mentioned Dong Mingzhu, many users want to install for homes with central air conditioning, the current building did not set aside space for a good, bring life to the installation can not be guaranteed, this is aVery big problem. Dong Mingzhu, air conditioning bracket after the aging may fall down, if any danger is pedestrians walking below, we imposed the construction of country houses per household has to have three square, square or two of electrical equipment store, easy to normal repair and maintenance, as well as electrical installations. She said, believe that the proposed Department of housing building soonCan be accepted. Writing memoir: NetEase finance: can you talk about some of the points you brought the two sessions this year? Dong Mingzhu: actually, I brought this idea is still just around our industry is that we now find the housing, urban housing that also change air conditioning requirements, many users is to install this type of household central air conditioning,Right now this long structure building process, not to set aside a good space, which brings life to our fitters is not guaranteed, is vulnerable to danger, dozens of buildings, for example, how do you ensure the installation of life, this is a very serious problem. Second is because the machine is large, where do you hang a wall, a long timeWeather yihou, does not necessarily which day may it of bracket appears problem of when, on may collapse down, past we also in heard had has so of phenomenon
diablo 3 power leveling, such as in with has ten years, and eight years of, consumer themselves with with also no this feel, but actually that steel frame ten years yihou on occurs changes has, so does not know what when day just off down has, following if has linePeople walking is very dangerous. So I think that in a civilized society constantly change when these security issues before us is. So I make a suggestion, proposed housing construction on the construction of housing in our country, to have a forced requirement, is that every household must have, should have a three square, square or two externalElectrical equipment of a secure storage place, easy to normal repair and maintenance, easy to install, this is a general question of daily. I believe that this proposal should be housing construction will soon be adopted. But there is a more important issue we have, is the current transformation and upgrade of our country have been imminent, and in fact also said last year, thisYears in a main position, how we produce products energy-saving, environmental protection, is also necessary to solve the problem. But at the time of invention, research on these technologies, often it's patents will not be able to get very good protection, between us and the United States, for example, our product patent is stolen by it, we lawyers case for three years before winning,In this case, I think it is detrimental to the independent innovation of enterprises, combat enthusiasm, but also grows, is to give them those reluctant to innovative enterprises, is because you don't have any severe punishment, they prefer to steal other people's things, than to create something better, because, after all, come too easy. China to go to the world, to moreEnterprise to go independent innovation of road, so we had playing this lawsuit really of is two a purpose, a purpose is to playing woke up he, sued this lawsuit to called they head sober, must to go independent innovation of road, second a to told integrity, told moral, you really of must think I this technology very good
tera power leveling, you can to buy I of technology, you does not should with so of a way, So I in joke, this 2 million is District money, if I purely to recovered back this a pen economic loss words, it should pay I several billion, because you in accordance with Taiwan number to broadcast, you three years sold has hundreds of thousands of Taiwan, on 's, so I think is we of purpose does not is purely is to a economic Shang of loss, and more is wanted to hope by so a action, makes we eachEnterprises should have a respect of themselves, to respect other people's thinking.
NetEase finance: after the case is there through research? Dong Mingzhu: of course, we do not have the case actually before we knew a lot, but I'd not experienced, I today is one I personally experienced this one example to illustrate this problem.In fact why intellectual property protection issues raised by? Not only because of my own experience I would like to ask, I am a NPC, unable to stand at a corporate level to talk about this question, should stand at a higher level, on behalf of the people that matter. In fact, many enterprises are engaged in independent innovation, and of course our industry enterprises engaged in innovation,But industry independent innovation of the industry more than, their patents, they infringed sometimes only because one can do no better, for example people invented something, support something, well, this man be poached, and he took this thing. As our business is concerned, might you take away something is something we lag behind, we continue in the inquestSome of the more advanced patented technology. But after all you are is a harm to others, especially those companies, finally developed a patented, individuals have very soon, after being poached, so this is a serious business damage, so I suggest is not on our behalf, because I've experience, no, I told you about the mainIs this example tells you. Is like this, for example about patent protection, then it's startup enterprises, such as food safety, I think it is related to patents is, if you invent your own patents, a life which does not harm others, that are very nutritious, then this is the case, then the enterprise sustainable development, the key protection patentsIs to protect some good business to sustainable development.
Others:
No comments:
Post a Comment